<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dedicated separate Firefox windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061</link>
	<description>Present Perfect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 03:19:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daf</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-60949</link>
		<dc:creator>Daf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 00:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-60949</guid>
		<description>The Mozilla project that people have mentioned to make each tab run in a separate process is called &lt;a href=&quot;https://wiki.mozilla.org/Content_Processes&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Electrolysis&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Mozilla project that people have mentioned to make each tab run in a separate process is called <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/Content_Processes" rel="nofollow">Electrolysis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spudd86</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-60089</link>
		<dc:creator>Spudd86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-60089</guid>
		<description>Not yet... But they are working on it.

Mozilla is working on multi-process browsing, IIRC the plan is to initially split into two processes, one for the chrome, the other for content (so yes one page can still crash all the others, but not the entire browser, I imagine the plan is to have FF recover from this all by itself)

I suppose once that goes in it might be possible to make an extension that does what you want... but they are supposedly eventually moving to something like chrome, one process per page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not yet&#8230; But they are working on it.</p>
<p>Mozilla is working on multi-process browsing, IIRC the plan is to initially split into two processes, one for the chrome, the other for content (so yes one page can still crash all the others, but not the entire browser, I imagine the plan is to have FF recover from this all by itself)</p>
<p>I suppose once that goes in it might be possible to make an extension that does what you want&#8230; but they are supposedly eventually moving to something like chrome, one process per page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osma</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59937</link>
		<dc:creator>Osma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 05:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59937</guid>
		<description>Sounds like you want IE6 - er, I mean Chromium. Nah, on a serious note, Firefox is pretty badly behind in the ballgame on some basic features like this. I tried to use that -no-remote -P solution for a while in a situation where I actually WANTED not just a separate process, but also separate extensions for some work. Even then it sucked, because later -new-window launched would latch on to the wrong process. Plus, it sucks up memory like mad. Pretty happy with chromium now, though still need firefox from time to time for some stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like you want IE6 &#8211; er, I mean Chromium. Nah, on a serious note, Firefox is pretty badly behind in the ballgame on some basic features like this. I tried to use that -no-remote -P solution for a while in a situation where I actually WANTED not just a separate process, but also separate extensions for some work. Even then it sucked, because later -new-window launched would latch on to the wrong process. Plus, it sucks up memory like mad. Pretty happy with chromium now, though still need firefox from time to time for some stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Fenzi</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59896</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Fenzi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59896</guid>
		<description>If you are running rawhide/fedora 12, why not use the cool sandbox command: 

http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/31247.html

Then your firefox is totally selinux isolated from the rest of your machine/desktop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are running rawhide/fedora 12, why not use the cool sandbox command: </p>
<p><a href="http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/31247.html" rel="nofollow">http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/31247.html</a></p>
<p>Then your firefox is totally selinux isolated from the rest of your machine/desktop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59895</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59895</guid>
		<description>Prism is exactly what you want for the job. It meets all of your stated requirements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prism is exactly what you want for the job. It meets all of your stated requirements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laszlo Pandy</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59893</link>
		<dc:creator>Laszlo Pandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59893</guid>
		<description>sudo apt-get install prism

There are packages already setup for certain websites:
sudo apt-get install prism-google-mail
sudo apt-get install prism-google-reader
sudo apt-get install prism-facebook

To use a custom website, manually create a launcher for prism, or use this extension:
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6665</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sudo apt-get install prism</p>
<p>There are packages already setup for certain websites:<br />
sudo apt-get install prism-google-mail<br />
sudo apt-get install prism-google-reader<br />
sudo apt-get install prism-facebook</p>
<p>To use a custom website, manually create a launcher for prism, or use this extension:<br />
<a href="https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6665" rel="nofollow">https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/6665</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bert</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59892</link>
		<dc:creator>bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59892</guid>
		<description>Under Windows, I&#039;d look at thinapp (application virtualization: application runs in a bubble, enabling multiple bubbles to exist with independent applications).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Windows, I&#8217;d look at thinapp (application virtualization: application runs in a bubble, enabling multiple bubbles to exist with independent applications).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Asselstine</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59891</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Asselstine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59891</guid>
		<description>Maybe it&#039;s time to give firefox a --new-window=URL option that opens a new window with the current profile.  When you find a problem in free software and you&#039;re a capable software developer, fixing the problem upstream can be fun and rewarding.

Other browsers get it right, FF should too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s time to give firefox a &#8211;new-window=URL option that opens a new window with the current profile.  When you find a problem in free software and you&#8217;re a capable software developer, fixing the problem upstream can be fun and rewarding.</p>
<p>Other browsers get it right, FF should too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Marcher</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59885</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Marcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59885</guid>
		<description>How about:

sudo -u testuser firefox

I know it&#039;s only a workaround but you&#039;d get a completely new environment. Even scriptable with creating a new user, starting firefox, waiting for it and the deleting the user...hmmm gotta do some shell scripting :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about:</p>
<p>sudo -u testuser firefox</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s only a workaround but you&#8217;d get a completely new environment. Even scriptable with creating a new user, starting firefox, waiting for it and the deleting the user&#8230;hmmm gotta do some shell scripting :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061&#038;cpage=1#comment-59883</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 13:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=1061#comment-59883</guid>
		<description>Funny how everyone repeats the same suggestion over and over. And some trolls suggest Epiphany and Chromium. What about Midori or Kazehakase? Or switching over to Windows while you&#039;re bored.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny how everyone repeats the same suggestion over and over. And some trolls suggest Epiphany and Chromium. What about Midori or Kazehakase? Or switching over to Windows while you&#8217;re bored.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
