<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: moap doap search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483&#038;feed=rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483</link>
	<description>Present Perfect</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:40:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483&#038;cpage=1#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 04:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>@mint:  well, I used to have all my links to https://apestaart.org/... up until two days ago.  So my drop happened before that.   But it *is* a possibility for it to drop further.

The reason I switched is because I disliked having my http:// links not match my https:// links, and there are some other things that complain about https:// links in general - Evolution can&#039;t subscribe to my releases.ics file for example if it&#039;s on https://

Is there any info though on things like this being bad for Google ranking ? My trac itself seems to be indexed well enough...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mint:  well, I used to have all my links to <a href="https://apestaart.org/.." rel="nofollow">https://apestaart.org/..</a>. up until two days ago.  So my drop happened before that.   But it *is* a possibility for it to drop further.</p>
<p>The reason I switched is because I disliked having my http:// links not match my https:// links, and there are some other things that complain about https:// links in general &#8211; Evolution can&#8217;t subscribe to my releases.ics file for example if it&#8217;s on https://</p>
<p>Is there any info though on things like this being bad for Google ranking ? My trac itself seems to be indexed well enough&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mint</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483&#038;cpage=1#comment-2741</link>
		<dc:creator>mint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483#comment-2741</guid>
		<description>I dunno, but maybe the self-signed certificate on the wrong domain trips google up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, but maybe the self-signed certificate on the wrong domain trips google up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sno</title>
		<link>http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483&#038;cpage=1#comment-2721</link>
		<dc:creator>sno</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 May 2007 02:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thomas.apestaart.org/log/?p=483#comment-2721</guid>
		<description>heya, just checked and google search for moap shows this page as 4th link in the uk :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>heya, just checked and google search for moap shows this page as 4th link in the uk :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
